Space governance you can step inside.
Read the launch brief →howdy [at] diplospace · orgSupport the work →
Diplo Space built the working Atlas independently. We are now seeking a small group of founding partners to take the platform through its public institutional release: new instruments, verification, accessibility, immersive development, and public deployment.
Founding partnerships from $50,000. The resulting public work remains independently governed and openly available.
Partners shape what gets built and see it first. What they cannot shape is what the evidence says, and that is exactly why their name is worth putting on it.
On the funded instrument or scenario, on the Founding Partners page, and at the public launch. Acknowledgment, never advertising.
An instrument, a scenario, an annual orbital edition, or a record increment, with the scope, timeline, and milestones in writing before you commit.
Private demonstrations and pilot participation as the release is built, in your room or remotely, on the headset or in a plain browser.
Twice a year: the roadmap, the new edition, what is next, and your input on priorities. Advisory, and welcome.
Explainers, the record, scenario materials, and after-action structures, released openly the day everyone gets them, so your people can cite them the next morning.
Many partners will do both. They are written as separate agreements on purpose.
Underwrite the public institutional release of the working Atlas, from $50,000. You choose what your name goes on; the work stays public and independently governed.
A season of facilitated exercises for your members, students, or staff, the headset build in your venue, and training so your own facilitators can run it after we leave. Scoped in writing; a founding partner can underwrite a season for an institution that cannot budget one.
A pilot is a program agreement, scoped and priced in writing, separate from sponsorship. That separation is what keeps a sponsorship a sponsorship under the IRS rules, and it means a partner institution can fund its own season or a founding partner can underwrite one for an institution that cannot.
A spacepower and space-governance literacy layer for members who are not engineers: a season of exercises, a headset at the chapter meeting, materials your chapters can run themselves.
A course module or capstone built on the instruments, a Washington teaching site with the headset in the room, and a citable scenario archive students can put in a footnote.
Your exercise, our instruments: the shared, navigable evidence layer under the discussion, and an after-action record that shows what the room saw.
Unclassified, multi-perspective, and neutral by design, so it can be used with mixed and international rooms without anyone asking whose side the model is on.
The working platform is not a proposal. Six instruments, a verified public record, published Field Notes, rehearsals that run in a plain browser, and a headset build in private institutional beta exist today, built on the founder's own time and money. What is missing is the release: the verification, accessibility, and deployment work that turns a working system into one institutions can rely on.
The launch objective, planned by function: data and verification, the spatial instruments, scenarios and accessibility, institutional pilots, and public deployment.
A stretch of $500,000 adds a second year of instruments and pilots. Three to five partners are preferred over one; every one is disclosed by name and amount.
Each level is a bounded scope, timeline, and budget in writing. Acknowledgment is a name and a thank-you, never advertising.
One defined instrument, dataset expansion, scenario, or annual orbital edition. Recognition: made possible with support from the sponsor, on the instrument.
The first serious partnership: designation, acknowledgment on Atlas and on the funded artifact, a place on this page, one private demonstration, and the launch acknowledgment.
Underwrites the platform itself: data, verification, spatial instruments, scenarios, accessibility, pilots, and the public launch.
By conversation, for foundations and major donors. We prefer several partners to one, so a lead is discussed privately.
Acknowledgments follow the IRS qualified-sponsorship rules. Anything a sponsor receives is valued in writing and kept under two percent of the payment, so a sponsorship stays a sponsorship and never becomes advertising.
Every agreement says so in writing: sponsorship buys no control over findings, sources, analysis, or what publishes; no exclusive-provider terms; no comparative language anywhere the name appears; every gift disclosed to the dollar by legal name.
Every cash or in-kind gift of $1,000 or more is disclosed to the exact dollar, by donor legal name. Anonymous gifts above that threshold are refused.
The full Funding Integrity Policy →This is also where declined gifts are recorded, with donor category, date, and amount declined. Nothing is recorded yet.
Diplo Space, Inc. · Virginia 501(c)(3) · EIN 99-1402470 · Support and lab programs · The record · The Atlas
Positions available. Founding partners will be listed here by legal name and amount, as the Funding Integrity Policy requires. There are none yet.
Say what you want to fund, or ask for a private demonstration first. If we are not the right lab for it, we will say so.
Or write to howdy [at] diplospace · org directly.
Diplo Space, Inc. is a nonprofit public-interest research and education lab. It uses open-source and public-domain data to translate space-governance regimes into navigable scenarios and exercises for non-specialist officials. It takes no policy positions, accepts no foreign-government funding, and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of State, the Department of War, or any government agency.